Is this 1984 or 2010?

"There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment. How often, or on what system, the Thought Police plugged in on any individual wire was guesswork. It was even conceivable that they watched everybody all the time. But at any rate they could plug in your wire whenever they wanted to. You had to live—did live, from habit that became instinct—in the assumption that every sound you made was overheard, and, except in darkness, every movement scrutinized."

Date line: Merion Pennsylvania Feb 18, 2010

It is being reported by the A.P. that the suburban school district of Merion P.A. has been spying on their students via school district issued laptops! What the hey is this 2010 or 1984??

It certainly gives new life to the above quote from Orwell's chilling vision of a future where the government had the power to hear and see everything a person might be doing. It appears that vision may have been more prophetic than Orwell ever dreamed.

Check out the line above where the line about them being able to "plug in your wire whenever they wanted to! Evidently this school district took this to heart as they turned on web cams installed on the laptops and spied on the students often times catching either the parents or students in "compromising" acts or positions.

For crying out loud these people could spy on their students as they dressed or undressed!! All this came to light after an assistant principle for the district called a student on the carpet and gave him the third degree for what was termed "engaging in improper behavior in his own home"!

This truly is an outrage Schools are supposed to be teaching children to be responsible citizens of a free country not the robotic subjects of a totalitarian state. So I ask once again is this 1984 or 2010? Starting to look scarily like 1984 to me! Time to stand up for freedom and take down tyranny!

How close are we to becoming a police state?

How close are we to becoming a police state? In my previous post a gave a sketchy outline of a plan for a domestic Stability Police Force. The idea of this S.P.F. is alarming to me. I'm all for the rule of law, as well as , law and order.I believe the majority of our men and women in our police forces do a magnificent job and are to be praised for what they do. I think that some aspects of a stability police force might be desirable. We have places in this nation controlled by gangs and thugs that ought to be declared in armed insurrection against the government. But then the Army was intended to be used to put down rebellions against the government so I guess we really don't need an S.P.F.

What worries me is that in my lifetime -and especially in the last 20 years - I have witnessed a tremendous erosion of our liberties. take time to watch this video and you too may ask how close ARE we to becoming a police state?

Obama, Interpol,Stability police and American Constitutional authority

Could Hugo Chavez be Obama's role model?

On Dec 17, 2009 President Barack Obama signed an executive order that I believe, as well as many others smarter than me, that could give Interpol unrestricted authority in the interior of the United States. The E.O in question is an order to amend executive order 12425(read more) and it in essence gives Interpol a free hand to do as it will with total and absolute immunity from all U.S. law!!!

Add to this a Rand Report (read more) that concludes the need for a domestic security force to help put down domestic insurgents. The report calls for creation of a stability police force in order to control crowds, riots or persons involved in long term disturbances.I.E teapartyers perhaps. Because the Army can't be used because of Posse Comatatis laws. In essence this would be a paramilitary force to quell in possible rebellion inside the U.S.

As if this were not enough consider this conclusion drawn by the U.S Army war college...
The military must be prepared, the document warned, for a “violent, strategic dislocation inside the United States,” which could be provoked by “unforeseen economic collapse...The global economic crisis ... already looms as the most serious one in decades, if not in centuries ... Economic crises increase the risk of regime-threatening instability if they are prolonged for a one- or two-year period,".

To add insult to injury "O" is already on record as saying that economic crisis is a bigger threat than terrorism. Folks we have a president that seemingly-as Rush Limbaugh has drawn attention to-considers the American public an enemy

What I have just outlined is a bit scary and could be used as a basis to argue that Obama is a traitor to this country and has violated his Constitutional oath. My big question is why all this NOW? I fear that Barack and the Democrats may be so hungry for power and paranoid of losing it that they may well be willing to use an American stability force, in concert with an Interpol that is above any public scrutiny whatsoever in order to oppress and silence anyone who opposes or resists them!!

Americans think "that can't happen here". But folks it already is happening and may well lead to Obama becoming the last President of this country and becoming the first dictator of America!!

Limbaughs open letter to O hits the nail on the head

I'm a little late on this story but Rush Limbaugh's open letter to Mr. Obama seems to have hit the nail "squarely" on the head! I always get a kick out of listening to Rush. He's just so darned politically incorrect and for darn sure isn't afraid to speak what's really on his mind. Limbaugh's letter to "O" is no different.

Rush begins by pointing out O'Bama's seeming lack of focus. The way that he is just trying to do too many things all at once. He goes on to point out a truth that Berry seems to have forgotten that this country is,after all,a nation of the people by the people and for the people ruled by the Constitution and not the dictatorial whims of the "enlightened one"!

The great one continues to give sage advice to the President advising him to take responsibility for the situation at hand. To quit trying to shift the blame and actually govern. He also advises the President to turn away from the socialist program he has embarked on and reminds him that Saul Alinsky and other such radicals are not the founders of this nation.

Listen to this gem for yourself and I think you will agree that Mr. Limbaugh indeed hits the nail on the head!